US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,245
ABDUL v. CONNER
as 4:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL and JABBAAR MUJAAHID ABDUL
Respondent:
ROBERT CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
TONY C. JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
TONY C JACKSON, JR
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORALES v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
LEONARDO T MORALES
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, LANCE NEFF and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMILEY v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
MILTON SMILEY
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. GARRETT
as 3:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
WALTER JOHNSON, III
Respondent:
C GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RINKINS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J RINKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIAZ v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
REINALDO DIAZ
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYNN v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
HENRY LYNN
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BREADON v. HEWETT
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
EMANUEL BREADON
Respondent:
WARDEN HEWETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
