US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 5,241
MILLER v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
DAVID R MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PESQUIERA v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
SERGIO PESQUIERA
Respondent:
MARRY WINGFIELD and BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YESBICK v. ENGLISH
as 3:2023cv24735
Petitioner:
TOMMY YESBICK
Respondent:
GARY ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNAM v. ALLEN
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
CLEMENT CALVIN BURNAM, JR
Respondent:
DAVID ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANTILLAN v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
JOE RAMON SANTILLAN
Respondent:
BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WARRICK v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2023cv24724
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER D WARRICK
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WADE v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00508
Petitioner:
RANDY J WADE
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AVIS v. DIXON
as 1:2023cv00277
Petitioner:
RICHARD I AVIS
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv24699
Petitioner:
EDWARD C BARTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOBBS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2023cv00298
Petitioner:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, TOMMY FORD, BAY COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
