US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 14,081
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. FITZPATRICK
as 4:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELDER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
RICHARD ELDER
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHARLEY v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
GERRARD P CHARLEY
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ILMART v. SASSER et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHE ILMART
Defendant:
DR SASSER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTILLO v. GABBY
as 5:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
PEDRO RAMIREZ CASTILLO, JR
Respondent:
JOHN GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VOSBURG v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RG VOSBURG
Defendant:
JOHNSON, PERKINS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
MARK HAWKINS
Defendant:
LANE COLLINS and WAGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARROW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
MARK BARROW
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
