US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 14,083
VOSBURG v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RG VOSBURG
Defendant:
JOHNSON, PERKINS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
GREEN JEFFERY and JEFFREY GREEN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARROW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
MARK BARROW
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 4:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
JASON HUNTER, SR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CHRISTINE PLETCHER, THEODORE JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MATHEWS v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DONALD LEAVINS and J STREEIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. HUGE et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
HUGE, LUSK and J M LAMBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASEY v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE J WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE KELLY
Defendant:
CHIP W SIMMONS, M HOUSAM and RAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, GARY HEWETT and D BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
