District Court Cases in Florida
Cases 51 - 60 of 804,155
MATOS v. Walmart, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01896
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
SORAYA MATOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Dyer v. Clean & Safe Global, Inc.
as 8:2024cv02451
Plaintiff:
Amanda Dyer
Defendant:
Clean & Safe Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Falzarano v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 6:2024cv01893
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Lara Falzarano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Verch v. Speedy Holdings Group, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01895
Defendant:
Speedy Holdings Group, Inc. doing business as Speedy Business Funding
Plaintiff:
Marco Verch
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Stewart v. Jak Media, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
Michael Stewart
Defendant:
Jak Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Howarth v. TM International Group LLC
as 8:2024cv02453
Defendant:
TM International Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Greene v. A.C. Williams Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00515
Defendant:
Craig Hamilton and A.C. Williams Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Zackery Greene
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
GRISALES-BASTO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2024cv00427
Petitioner:
DIANA GRISALES-BASTO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORT v. WELLS
as 3:2024cv00516
Defendant:
KELVIN C WELLS
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W SHORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
ALONZO O'NEAL COLE
Defendant:
DAVIS, ANGELA JONES and MR ETHERIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
