US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 208
DAVIS v. ROCKET MORTGAGE LLC
as 7:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
MARGARET DAVIS
Defendant:
ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HYUNDAI MARINE & FIRE INSURANCE CO LTD v. CORDELE INTERMODAL SERVICES INC
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Coredele Intermodal Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ONESOUTH BANK v. SUMMER TIME MELONS LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
OneSouth Bank
Defendant:
Summer Time Melons, LLC, Global Produce Sales, Inc. and Aaron Curt Titshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
KYTE CENTRIFUGE LLC v. FARR
as 3:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kyte Centrifuge, LLC and KYTE CENTRIFUGE LLC
Defendant:
Everett Farr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
T-MOBILE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
HICKS et al v. MILLENNIA HOUSING MANAGEMENT LTD
as 4:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
KATIE HICKS and KEINO HICKS
Defendant:
MILLENNIA HOUSING MANAGEMENT LTD and BALLARD WAY APARTMENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
PURNELL v. PEPSICO INC et al
as 7:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Brendan Purnell
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC., Target Corporate Services, Inc., PEPSICO INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BOSTON v. DOE
as 3:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BOSTON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3723 Federal Tort Claims Act
UNITED COMMUNITY BANK v. NEILL
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
UNITED COMMUNITY BANK
Defendant:
JULIE M NEILL doing business as CHAMPION RENOVATIONS AND REPAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
