US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,519
JONES v. DILLS
as 5:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
TRACY M JONES
Respondent:
ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KELVIN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VEAL v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
ERIC DEMETRIUS VEAL
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WILKINSON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STYLES v. ODUM
as 7:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
DERRICK STYLES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLATER v. WARDEN AT COASTAL
as 5:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARK SLATER
Defendant:
WARDEN AT COASTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MACK v. CARR
as 5:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
STEVE MACK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. PAULK
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
ERIC DEWAYNE PHILLIPS
Respondent:
ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBEGINSKI v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00154
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOLDEN v. JESTER
as 5:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOLDEN
Respondent:
WARDEN T JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
