US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,611
MORRALL v. MCDANIEL
as 5:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
BRANDON MORRALL
Respondent:
WARDEN MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANTHONY v. PAGE
as 5:2024cv00247
Respondent:
WARDEN TRACY PAGE
Petitioner:
JAY'VON ANTHONY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. SPROUL
as 1:2024cv00108
Respondent:
KEVIN SPROUL
Petitioner:
MELVIN JAMES JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MILLER v. SPROUL
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
ROMAIN CORGILL MILLER
Respondent:
KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BALL v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00240
Respondent:
GREGORY SAMPSON
Petitioner:
TRAVIS BALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COX v. BOWEN
as 5:2024cv00236
Defendant:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Petitioner:
Joshua Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00237
Respondent:
TEKETA JESTER, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COLLECTIONS
Petitioner:
WILLIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v.DANFORTH et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
RODERICK BO JACKSON
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and WILLIAM DANFORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
LYONS v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00228
Respondent:
MACON STATE PRISON
Petitioner:
CLAYTON LYONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. MONTERREY, et al.
as 5:2024cv00225
Defendant:
OFFICER MARSHALL, OFFICER WILKES, OFFICER MONTERREY and others
Plaintiff:
DENVER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
