US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,403
MCKISSIC v. ZIEGLER et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
CARLTON STEVE MCKISSIC
Defendant:
Corporal SHERRY ZIEGLER, VALERIE HOLDER, R T BOREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WYMER v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
JAMES WYMER
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BILOUS v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN BILOUS
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, PA JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JORDAN
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AVERY v. SIZEMORE et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
CRAIG DEWAYNE AVERY
Defendant:
JUDGE SIZEMORE, LEWIS LAMB, LEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASH v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JABBARI KEYON ASH, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITED v. GAINES et al
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN THOMAS WHITED
Defendant:
GAINES, BLACKSHEAR, FOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEAL v. SHROPSHIRE
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DENORIA BEAL
Defendant:
RALPH SHROPSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARHAM v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MANDRELL PARHAM
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN and CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
