U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,885
State of Georgia v. Johnston
as 4:2025cv00093
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Charles Glenn Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Reid v. Fulton County Government
as 1:2025cv02120
Plaintiff:
Tommy Reid
Defendant:
Fulton County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ellington v. City of Conyers, Georgia
as 1:2025cv02123
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Ellington, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Conyers, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. Timberland Partners LLC et al
as 1:2025cv02133
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Timberland Partners LLC and Owner Bob Fransen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Partee v. Hill
as 1:2025cv02071
Plaintiff:
Lashawnda Partee
Defendant:
Victor Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archelus v. Atrium Health Floyd Medical Center et al
as 4:2025cv00086
Plaintiff:
Amelina Archelus
Defendant:
Atrium Health Floyd Medical Center and Kurt Stuenkel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Joseph v. Hurst
as 1:2025cv02093
Plaintiff:
Peter Joseph
Defendant:
Sarah Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. The First Bank, Inc
as 1:2025cv02017
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brown
Defendant:
The First Bank, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Pattni v. City of Sandy Springs, Georgia et al
as 1:2025cv02023
Plaintiff:
Kishan Pattni
Defendant:
City of Sandy Springs, Georgia, Detective Michael Burson, Officer J Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benjamin v. Gordon et al
as 1:2025cv02035
Plaintiff:
Leon Fransceco Benjamin
Defendant:
Omaya Danique Gordon, R. Timothy Hamil, Kristina Hammer Blum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
