US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 16,821
Barton v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Lamont Anthony Barton
Defendant:
Ron H. Freeman and DeAndre Loucks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bey v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Damar Bey
Defendant:
Brittany Quiera Austin and Anita L Dowdell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Petro v. Bohannon et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kristen Justice Petro
Defendant:
Justin Bohannon, John Doe Holbrooks and Image Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Simmons v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants et al
as 1:2024cv01789
Plaintiff:
Albert Clayton Simmons
Defendant:
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Georgia Society of CPA's, Georgia State Board of Accountancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
