US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,501
Kavanagh v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Leslie Kavanagh
Defendant:
Timothy Smith and Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webber v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Brannon et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Tremar Harris
Defendant:
Daydan Brannon, Cannon Mcleod and Ansley Fennell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The United States of America v. Woodlands at Montgomery LP et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Woodlands at Montgomery LP, Woodlands at Montgomery GP LLC, Kittle Property Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Nicholson v. Colbert et al
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Nicholson
Defendant:
Lisa G. Colbert, Monique T. Baker, Jameeka Aiken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saldana v. Jaddou
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jose Saldana
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burroughs v. Wells Fargo Mortgage
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William S. Burroughs
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Brady
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Cordarriel Green
Defendant:
Deputy Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minnis v. Satilla Memorial Health
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Ngan Kim Nguyen Minnis
Defendant:
Satilla Memorial Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
