US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 3,782
Weems v. Ware State Prison
as 5:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Cetery L. Weems
Defendant:
Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonon v. Wilhoite et al
as 4:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
China Lonon
Defendant:
Matthew C. Wilhoite, Brian Deal and U.S. Marshal's Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Richmond County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Christopher F. Jones
Defendant:
Richmond County Sheriff Department and Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Danforth et al
as 5:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Robert Danforth, Jasmine Knox and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jefferson
Defendant:
Warden Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weems v. Ware State Prison
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Cetery L. Weems
Defendant:
Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Kennin D. Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy Johnson, Deputy Williams, Cpl. Colemen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentley v. Pineiro
as 4:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Tony Bentley and Tony L. Bentley
Defendant:
Warden Aaron Pineiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Horton et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Kendrick Horton, Shelton Horrelle, Moses Stepan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conyers v. Carter et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Richard Conyers
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Carter, Warden Tracey Jefferson and Ricky Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
