US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,490
Jacobs v. Upton
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Karriem Jacobs
Defendant:
Warden Upton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmond v. Benton et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Quinton Edmond
Defendant:
Warden Brooks L. Benton, Dr. Olatunji Awe, Nurse Gatewood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Cox
Defendant:
Tarmarshe Smith, Desiree Jones, Warden Jermaine White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Lt. Johnson, Officer Bess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Ramon Penick v. Ware State Prison Department of Georgia
as 5:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ramon Penick
Defendant:
Ware State Prison Department of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Chambers
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Liberty County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Nathan Avery Roach
Defendant:
Liberty County Jail, Captain McEady, Major Krumnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penick v. Jpay/Securus.co et al
as 4:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ramon Penick
Defendant:
Jpay/Securus.co and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashley v. Doe et al
as 5:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Justin Ashley
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jane (FNU) Doe and John (FNU) Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penick v. Jpay/Securus.co et al
as 5:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ramon Penick
Defendant:
Jpay/Securus.co and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
