Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 14,450
Kersaint v. Valdosta State Prison
as 1:2025cv01925
Plaintiff:
Jordan Kersaint
Defendant:
Valdosta State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNING v. JONES et al
as 5:2025cv00147
Plaintiff:
RALPH HARRISON BENNING
Defendant:
WARDEN DESHAWN JONES, BENJAMIN FORD, DIRECTOR KENNETH ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2025cv00148
Plaintiff:
JERRY CHAMBERS, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN SAMPSON, MRS TYSON, UNIT MANAGER POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Labat
as 1:2025cv01875
Plaintiff:
Paul Richardson
Defendant:
Pat Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IVY v. WARE STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2025cv00032
Plaintiff:
Hilary Oliver Ivy
Defendant:
Ware State Prison, Chief of Security and Classification Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOINER v. WATERS
as 5:2025cv00144
Plaintiff:
ERVIN JOINER
Defendant:
JONATHAN P WATERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOINER v. HOUSTON COUNTY JUDICIAL COURT
as 5:2025cv00146
Plaintiff:
ERVIN JOINER
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY JUDICIAL COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOINER v. HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 5:2025cv00145
Plaintiff:
ERVIN JOINER
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Fulton County et al
as 1:2025cv01820
Plaintiff:
Travis S Pierce and travis s. pierce
Defendant:
Fulton County and Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Benton, Ge 5 et al
as 1:2025cv01775
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamont Parks
Defendant:
Benton, Ge 5, Cobb County Sheriff Office and Cobb County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
