Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 13,753
Andrew v. Babb et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Todd Andrew
Defendant:
Sheriff Barry H. Babb and Fayette County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01301
Plaintiff:
Robert Pierce
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Fulton County Sheriffs Office and Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Byron T Arnold
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Sword and McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARKE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
JEROME CLARKE
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS DIVINCI JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SAMPSON, WARDEN GRACE, CERT OFFICER LOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Angelo Bernard Banks
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillps v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Phillps
Defendant:
John Doe, Lieutenant Swats, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Defendant:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
