District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 181 - 190 of 164,318
Turkey Merck Ltd. v. Spencer Gifts, LLC
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Turkey Merck Ltd.
Defendant:
Spencer Gifts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Barnett v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02618
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barnett
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Simmons v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02627
Plaintiff:
Sophia Simmons
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lozano v. Warden FSL Jesup
as 2:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Miguel Lozano
Respondent:
Warden FSL Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gillis v. Wilson
as 6:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Frank Gillis
Defendant:
Sgt. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEDFORD v. EBARLE MARKETING SERVICES INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD LEDFORD
Defendant:
EBARLE MARKETING SERVICES INC. and SOLAR MOSAIC LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Non-Motor Vehicle
BREYMEIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BREYMEIER
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
