US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,888
Quinn v. Hvarre
as 1:2023cv16619
Petitioner:
Samuel Quinn
Respondent:
Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowes-Northern v. Garnett et al
as 1:2023cv16641
Petitioner:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Respondent:
Chales Truitt and Jason Garnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Monti et al
as 1:2023cv16541
Petitioner:
Michael Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Monti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garabedian v. Lammer
as 3:2023cv50433
Petitioner:
Hagpop Garabedian
Respondent:
Warden Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rainey v. Willis
as 1:2023cv16403
Petitioner:
Tevin Rainey
Respondent:
Anthony Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guyton Jr v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv16464
Petitioner:
Robert Guyton Jr
Respondent:
Charles Truitt and Illinois Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16236
Petitioner:
Frederick Dean
Respondent:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Stempinski et al
as 1:2023cv16289
Petitioner:
Yoquan Williams
Defendant:
Richard Stepinski and Rich Stempinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alarcon v. Hinthorne
as 1:2023cv16237
Petitioner:
Modesto Alarcon
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leach v. Greene
as 3:2023cv50421
Petitioner:
Javarus Leach
Respondent:
Brittney Green and Brittany Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
