US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 13,179
Sargent v. Cook County Department of Corrections Cermak et al
as 1:2024cv07386
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections Cermak and Fidel Cavillo
Plaintiff:
Shermaine Cedric Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Tom Dart et al
as 1:2024cv07392
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Officer Solis
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wachter v. Nickel et al
as 1:2024cv07292
Defendant:
Andrew Nickel
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv07143
Defendant:
Andrea Ward, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Cermak Heath Services and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orozco v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv07154
Plaintiff:
Hilario L. Orozco
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaragoza v. Mershon et al
as 3:2024cv50341
Defendant:
Manzano, Helfrich, Mershon and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Zaragoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv07173
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemphill v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv07107
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Joliet Treatment Center et al
as 1:2024cv07087
Defendant:
Larry, Joliet Treatment Center, Givens and others
Plaintiff:
Ned James, 3rd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2024cv07025
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Plaintiff:
Julius Goldie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
