US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 9,969
Ferguson v. Ridings et al
as 3:2024cv01752
Defendant:
Patterson, Stephen Ridings, Geller and others
Plaintiff:
Leon C. Ferguson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. USA
as 3:2024cv01748
Petitioner:
Ricardo Little
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Limes v. Effingham Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv01749
Defendant:
Andy Warner and Effingham Police Department
Plaintiff:
Hayden Limes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mitchell v. Shawnee C.C. et al
as 3:2024cv01738
Defendant:
L.T Johnson, Mrs. Reed and Shawnee C.C.
Plaintiff:
Willis Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01740
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, Lt. Dudek, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Davila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2024cv01723
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Petitioner:
Darion Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stafford v. Kendall County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv01728
Defendant:
Il Dept Of Corrections, Kendall County Jail and Wexford Health Source
Plaintiff:
Randall Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seats v. Wills
as 3:2024cv01715
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Petitioner:
Devin Seats
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01714
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Davis v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01717
Defendant:
Garrett Leposky, C/O Garcia and C/O E.
Plaintiff:
DeAndre K Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
