Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 12,709
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Officer Baker, Lance Korando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Wasko et al
as 1:2024cv03670
Plaintiff:
Arron Marko Thompson
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larive v. Metropolitan Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv03585
Plaintiff:
Shannon Larive and Metropolitan Correction Center
Defendant:
John Officer Doe, Metropolitan Correctional Center, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hancock v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hancock
Defendant:
Unknown, Spurlock, Mr. Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Reel
as 2:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Todd Henson
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Reel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Bennett
Defendant:
Jerri Cooper, Marin Share, Dawn R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Will County Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv03681
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamarr Davis
Defendant:
Will County Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Seeley et al
as 1:2024cv03491
Petitioner:
Jose Reyes
Respondent:
Jason Seeley, Marc Hergott and Mundelein Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dahl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Seeley et al
as 3:2024cv03098
Plaintiff:
Jose Reyes
Defendant:
Jason Seeley, Marc Hergott and Mundelein Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
