District Court Cases in Illinois
Cases 51 - 60 of 246,799
Laughlin v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01917
Plaintiff:
Tom Laughlin
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Borrenpohl v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01918
Plaintiff:
Raymond Borrenpohl
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lancaster v. Lewis and Clark Community College
as 3:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lancaster
Defendant:
Lewis and Clark Community College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brownlee v. Miller et al
as 3:2023cv01906
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lavon Brownlee
Defendant:
Mr. Christopher Miller, Mr. Antonio White, Mr. Kevin Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01915
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ferguson v. Anderson
as 3:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
Leon Cortez Ferguson
Defendant:
Harry W. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berlin v. Manderson et al
as 3:2023cv01912
Plaintiff:
Darrell Allen Berlin
Defendant:
Monique L. Manderson, Stephanie Bullar, Raymelle Schoos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Baker
as 3:2023cv03193
Plaintiff:
James Bell
Defendant:
Thomas Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Renken et al
as 1:2023cv01213
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
Chris Renken, Nathan Haynes, Dakota Demoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
