District Court Cases in Illinois
Cases 91 - 100 of 278,181
Rusk v. Mail Handler et al
as 3:2024cv03293
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Mail Handler
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rusk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Orris
as 4:2024cv04189
Defendant:
Angelica Orris
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodruff v. Orris
as 4:2024cv04190
Plaintiff:
Ricky D Woodruff
Defendant:
Angelica Orris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Williams v. Worthington et al
as 1:2024cv10850
Defendant:
Mary Worthington, Patourner, Frias and others
Plaintiff:
Terry J Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khara Inc. et al v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv10865
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Plaintiff:
Khara Inc. and Ground Works Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Young v. Segregation Staff
as 3:2024cv02342
Defendant:
Segregation Staff
Plaintiff:
Desmond Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boclair v. Sterrett et al
as 3:2024cv02344
Plaintiff:
Stanley Boclair
Defendant:
Anthony Wills and Samuel Sterrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuno v. Crow et al
as 3:2024cv02345
Defendant:
Gregory D Little, Christel S Crow and Jon Uraski
Plaintiff:
Jesse Zuno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Franklin et al
as 3:2024cv02347
Defendant:
William Franklin and Rodney Anderson
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
