US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 119
Titus v. HTH Companies, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00026
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 501 Federal Motor Carrier Saftey Regulation
McKinney et al v. Diversified Machine Bristol LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00504
Plaintiff:
Don McKinney and Sonya Brantley
Defendant:
Diversified Machine Bristol LLC , Chassix Inc and XYZ Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
United States of America v. Five Star Roofing Systems, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Five Star Roofing Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Grimes v. Evergreen Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00472
Plaintiff:
Matthew Grimes
Defendant:
Evergreen Recreational Vehicles, LLC , KR Enterprises Inc and JMA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Bogota v. Dometic Corporation
as 3:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
Giberto Bogota
Defendant:
Dometic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinkham v. American Mitsuba Corporation
as 1:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Mary Tinkham
Defendant:
American Mitsuba Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paredes et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Armando Paredes , Desideria Paredes , Mayra Paredes and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Hermilo Cantu, Jr. and Milo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Bish et al v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
as 2:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
David Bish and Peter Woznicki
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
King v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
as 2:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
Matthew King
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Rogers v. Forest River Inc
as 3:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
James Rogers
Defendant:
Forest River Inc and Quincy L/N/U
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
