Indiana Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 151 - 160 of 3,650
Prater v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00965
Plaintiff: Robin K. Prater
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BALVIN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff: MYRA A. BALVIN
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SKINNER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01950
Plaintiff: JOB S. SKINNER
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BUSH v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00179
Plaintiff: JEREMY W. BUSH
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BOYD v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv00181
Plaintiff: SONJA R. BOYD
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whiting v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00372
Plaintiff: Luz Z. Whiting
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MUNDELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00505
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. MUNDELL
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MANDRELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00178
Plaintiff: ERICA A. MANDRELL
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CRUZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01929
Plaintiff: SHARANE J. CRUZ
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NEES v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff: VALERIE M. NEES
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?