Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,742
STILL v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00068
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALAN STILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Couchman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00210
Unknown:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David L. Couchman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vandergraff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mary Beth Vandergraff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Unknown:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HATCHER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00860
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
NICOLE D. HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Curtis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00409
Unknown:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Plaintiff:
James K. Curtis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SANQUENETTI v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
SAUNSERRA CHEYENNE SANQUENETTI
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JOHNSON v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00066
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HUGHES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
RON N HUGHES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SEVER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
BRENNA SEVER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
WISE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00823
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY N. WISE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.