Indiana Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,097
DENNY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00039
Plaintiff: TIFFANY N. DENNY
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCHELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00040
Plaintiff: NICOLE M. SCHELL
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BLAGRAVE v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00037
Plaintiff: ROBERT BLAGRAVE
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tibbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00079
Plaintiff: Bray A. Tibbs
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MUDD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. MUDD
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
LIVINGSTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER S. LIVINGSTON
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Simerman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff: Lori A. Simerman
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barsich-Rangel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff: Tamara M. Barsich-Rangel
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WESTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff: ANN M. WESTON
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCOTT v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff: GARTH R. SCOTT
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?