US District Court for the District of Kansas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 674
Hunnell-Villines v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

as 2:2019cv02581
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Sheila Hunnell-Villines
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. USHealth Group, Inc. et al

as 2:2019cv02534
Plaintiff:
Nathan C. Jones and Lyn J. Buchmiller
Defendant:
USHealth Group, Inc. and USHealth Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Gardner v. Coleman American Moving Services, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02478
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gardner
Defendant:
Coleman American Moving Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Goodfriend v. MS Electronics LLC
as 2:2019cv02479
Plaintiff:
Richard Goodfriend
Defendant:
MS Electronics LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
RX Savings, LLC et al v. Besch et al

as 2:2019cv02439
Plaintiff:
Dan Henry, David Shewmaker, RX Savings, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Michael Rea
Defendant:
Besch Holdings, LLC, Laxman Degala, Douglas Besch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Winters v. Central Bank of the Midwest et al
as 2:2019cv02422
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine M. Winters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bicknell v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02417
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC, FBCS, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
lora bicknell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. JTM Capital Management, LLC
as 5:2019cv04051
Defendant:
JTM Capital Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Logan Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
T-Mobile Central LLC et al v. Wichita, City of et al
as 6:2019cv01162
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Central LLC and APC Towers III, LLC
Defendant:
Wichita, City of and Wichita City Council
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.