US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,149
Salyers v. Robey
as 4:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Cecil W. Salyers
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noonan v. Green
as 5:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
James J. Noonan and James Blair, Jr.
Respondent:
James D. Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mart v. Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
Bobby Hanson Mart, Jr.
Respondent:
Kentucky Department of Corrections and Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McNeil v. Jordan
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Cedric B. McNeil
Respondent:
Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otterson v. Richards
as 1:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Derek Matthew Otterson
Defendant:
Jamie Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Valentine
as 4:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
David Alan Jenkins
Respondent:
Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. McKenzie
as 3:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
Adam Anthony Barker
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lotz v. Akers
as 3:2022cv00575
Petitioner:
Jerry David Lotz
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
James Bradley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stone v. Green
as 3:2022cv00545
Petitioner:
Dante' Corvette Stone
Respondent:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
