US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 5,346
Hubbard v. USA
as 5:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Creadell Hubbard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brown v. USA
as 3:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Tyreek Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Watson v. Elizabethtown Police Department
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kenneth Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Elizabethtown Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Woodford County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kenneth Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Woodford County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Valentine et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Allen Wayne Hatcher
Respondent:
Warden Ann Valentine and Attorney General Russel Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry, Luke Whittaker, Shawn Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lohden v. Decker
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Edward Lohden, Jr.
Defendant:
Luke Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Lairson
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Newton
Defendant:
Whitney Stich Lairson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Claud et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ryan Garner
Defendant:
Jailer Ken Claud, Lt. Donald Underwood and Nurse Leesia Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Seth Whittaker and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
