Kentucky Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 3,476
Faller v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
James Stuart Faller, II and Jim S. Faller, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Unknown Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents, Unknown Internal Revenue Service Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Fulkerson v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 3:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fulkerson
Defendant:
Keegan Kirkpatrick and Brian Voils
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. CS/KY/LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brenda L. Alexander
Defendant:
CS/KY/LLC, Key Property Mgmt, U.S. Dept of Housing and Urban Dvlpmt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Kidd v. Kilbourne
as 3:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Robert Kidd
Defendant:
Hayden Kilbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurst v. Simms et al
as 3:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Jack Hurst
Defendant:
Charles Simms, III and Diane Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Alliance et al
as 3:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Hope Campbell
Defendant:
Alliance, PNC, Park Federal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Washington v. Cameron
as 3:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
Daniel Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopes v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Christian Lopes
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Officer Bryan Trowell, Officer Brian Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deng v. Boom
as 3:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ngong Lang Deng
Defendant:
Judge Claria Horn Boom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Pactiv Evergreen, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
Pactiv Evergreen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
