US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 5,766
Louis v. Stearns et al
as 1:2024cv01252
Defendant:
Warden Stearns, Warden Buckle, Officer Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crooms v. Abbeville et al
as 6:2024cv01262
Defendant:
Rodney Vincent, Lt Riggs, Trent Guidry and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Crooms, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crooms v. Abbeville et al
as 6:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Robert Crooms, Jr
Defendant:
Police Dept City of Abbeville, Trent Guidry and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chargois-El v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2024cv01264
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Marcus Myers and James M LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Kendell Joseph Chargois-El and Kendell Chargois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sepulvado v. Sweet et al
as 5:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Steven Dean Sepulvado, Jr
Defendant:
Aarron Mitchell, KayLynn Remedies and Berlion Sweet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lott v. River Bend Detention Center
as 3:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Shane Lott
Defendant:
Warden River Bend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Kaplan et al
as 6:2024cv01222
Defendant:
Police Dept of Kaplan, Joshua Hardy, Irvin Cates and others
Plaintiff:
Boyd Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Steadman
as 5:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Caleb Gray
Defendant:
C Steadman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv01212
Defendant:
Sgt Anderson and D Darby
Plaintiff:
Carlos Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Medical Staff et al
as 6:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Brannon James Ross
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Ms Sampe, Unknown Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
