US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 12,667
Bragg v. Dauzat
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Stephan Tyler Bragg
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tabor v. State of Louisiana Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Tony Joseph Tabor
Defendant:
State of LA Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00424
Petitioner:
Jekorris Loudarries Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. Early et al
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lewis
Defendant:
Ms Early, C Garrett and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granger v. Unknown Defendants
as 6:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Alan Granger
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Modisett v. F B O P et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael Antwaine Modisett
Defendant:
FBOP and Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lugman v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Abdul K Lugman
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nunez-Reynoso v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foster v. Neil et al
as 5:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Lonnie Neil, Roderick Malcolm, Curtis Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Richland Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jamie H Lindsey
Defendant:
Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and Kendra Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
