Louisiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 12,088
Simpson v. Cox et al
as 2:2024xc00611
Not Yet Classified:
Christopher J. Simpson
Defendant:
Katherine E. Cox, Victoria Stelfox, Vincent Wynne Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act - Public Accommodations
Parker v. Facebook et al
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Stefano Markell Parker
Defendant:
Facebook and Meta
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dunn v. F B I et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Catherine Chase Nugent Dunn
Defendant:
F B I, Sheriffs Office Rapides Parish, City of New Orleans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stockman v. Edwards
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Randy Malcolm Stockman
Defendant:
Toney Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lacroix. City of Pineville et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Charles Lacroix
Defendant:
City of Pineville and James Gilchrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
