US District Court for the District of Maine Civil Rights Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,939
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
POOLE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY POOLE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, SCOTT KANE, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHUSTER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHUSTER
Defendant:
DANNY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PIKE et al v. BUDD
as 1:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA PIKE and NATASHA IRVING
Defendant:
CHARLES F BUDD, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
EMRIT v. SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF FBI FIELD OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILBERT v. STATE OF MAINE
as 2:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE
Interested Party:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILBERT v. ST MARY'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN GRAHAM GILBERT
Defendant:
ST MARY'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MCCURDY v. TOWN OF BRUNSWICK et al
as 2:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
PRESCOTT MCCURDY
Defendant:
TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, JOHN ELDRIDGE, COMMANDER HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
