US District Court for the District of Maryland Labor Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 206
Heck-Russell v. Consumer Credit Counseling Services of Maryland and Delaware, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03143
Plaintiff:
Nina Heck-Russell
Defendant:
Consumer Credit Counseling Services of Maryland and Delaware, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Smith v. Caesars Baltimore Management Company, L.L.C.
as 1:2017cv03014
Plaintiff:
Diana Smith
Defendant:
Caesars Baltimore Management Company, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. The Overhead Door Company Baltimore Incorporated
as 1:2017cv02979
Plaintiff:
Edward Robinson
Defendant:
The Overhead Door Company Baltimore Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pollock v. RD Bowman & Sons Inc.
as 1:2017cv02353
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Pollock
Defendant:
RD Bowman & Sons Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kolich v. Coffman Nursing Home, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02137
Plaintiff:
Krista Kolich
Defendant:
Coffman Nursing Home, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cline v. Thomas N. O'Connor Plumbing & Heating, LLC
as 8:2017cv02103
Plaintiff:
Jason Cline
Defendant:
Thomas N. O'Connor Plumbing & Heating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpkins v. Erickson Living Management, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01880
Plaintiff:
Maria N. Simpkins
Defendant:
Erickson Living Management, LLC and Karen Mariano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01646
Plaintiff:
Trina Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc. , Mark Floyd, Chinyere Agbayin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Packett v. University of Maryland Medical Center
as 1:2017cv01630
Plaintiff:
Katherine Packett
Defendant:
University of Maryland Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. DAVCO Restaurants, LLC
as 1:2017cv01512
Plaintiff:
Linda Wilson
Defendant:
DAVCO Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
