US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 2,613
Sanchez v. Divris
as 1:2022cv10676
Petitioner:
Oscar Sanchez
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. MCI-Shirley Medium Superintendent
as 1:2022cv10648
Plaintiff:
Luther Lee Williams
Respondent:
MCI-Shirley Medium Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Moniz
as 1:2022cv10640
Petitioner:
Craig O Anderson
Respondent:
Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv10625
Petitioner:
Terence L Thomas
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv10538
Petitioner:
Faith Newton
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Marshalls and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Donahue v. United State of America
as 1:2022cv10566
Petitioner:
David Donahue
Respondent:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davila v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv10572
Petitioner:
Geovani Davila
Respondent:
Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Saint-Vil v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10574
Petitioner:
Johnavon Saint-Vil
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Dolan et al
as 1:2022cv10546
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Byron Watson
Defendant:
Edward Dolan
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marques v. Kelly
as 1:2022cv10512
Petitioner:
Dustin M Marques
Respondent:
Shiela Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
