US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,145
Schmitt v. Gonsalves
as 1:2025cv10064
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Defendant:
Jeffrey Gonsalves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Denehy et al
as 1:2025cv10066
Defendant:
Alicea, C.O Makowski, C.O Gurney and others
Plaintiff:
Lastarsandre Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abernathy v. Brooks et al
as 1:2025cv10019
Defendant:
Nathan Zapata, Stephen W Lawrie, Anthony J Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Garber et al
as 4:2025cv40005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Mark Donahue, Victor Clay, Alan Garber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Hisman, et al
as 4:2024cv40168
Defendant:
Bethany Hisman and Anahory
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Lyft
as 4:2024cv40169
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Lyft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Vital Core et al
as 4:2024cv40170
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Pratt Crystal and Vital Core
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Golden et al
as 1:2024cv13182
Defendant:
Matthew D Bober, Ryan T Matthews, Esq, Stephen Loesch, Esq and others
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. The Boston Herald et al
as 4:2024cv40164
Defendant:
Flint McColgan, The Boston Herald and Camilo Fonseca
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer v. Commonwealth et al
as 1:2024cv13173
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dyer
Defendant:
Boston Medical Center Security, Commonwealth, Boston EMS 21 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
