US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 2,082
Bradley v. York County Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv10269
Plaintiff:
George E Bradley
Defendant:
York County Sheriff, Portland City Police, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Taylor v. Sackler et al
as 1:2022cv10226
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Sackler, Purdue Pharmaceuticals, LP and The Sackler Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. The York County Sheriff.
as 1:2022cv10189
Plaintiff:
George E Bradley
Defendant:
The York County Sheriff.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Einsenberg v. Peoples Republic of China
as 1:2022cv10194
Plaintiff:
Leeland Einsenberg
Defendant:
Peoples Republic of China
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Fulton County Sheriff
as 1:2022cv10154
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Libertad v. Casey et al
as 1:2022cv10130
Plaintiff:
Lucha El Por Libertad and Steven Perez
Defendant:
Ryan Casey and Laurence D Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Plymouth County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2021cv12096
Plaintiff:
Malik D Harrison
Defendant:
Plymouth County Sheriff Department, Oliver and Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Dumornay et al
as 1:2021cv12073
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Mitchell Dumornay, Amanda Matteson, DeMoura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Daou et al
as 1:2021cv12056
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Margarita Daou, Sherry Hannen, Merdith Lobour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Devens Federal Medical Center
as 1:2021cv12040
Plaintiff:
Sean Jenkins
Defendant:
Devens Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
