Massachusetts Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,663
Ritrovato v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv12335
Plaintiff:
Susan L. Ritrovato
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Costa v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv12315
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Fernanda Costa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ruggiero v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv30110
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Ruggiero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Baptiste v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv12257
Plaintiff:
Lora Baptiste
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rose v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv12234
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Galen Demone Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pepper v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv30101
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Pepper
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bergeron v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv12047
Plaintiff:
Ronny Bergeron
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodrigues v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11975
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Gail Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv11946
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Toribio Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Macko v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv11810
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Richard Macko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
