Massachusetts Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,221
Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv11946
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Toribio Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Macko v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv11810
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Richard Macko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ogarro v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11789
Plaintiff:
H.S.O.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Sisco v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv40095
Plaintiff:
Mr Luke Sisco
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rodrigues v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv11737
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Lea Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ortiz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11704
Plaintiff:
Robert Ortiz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lee et al v. Salem Social Security Office
as 1:2024cv11404
Defendant:
Salem Social Security Office
Plaintiff:
Donhee Jung and Heewon Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Pedroza v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11282
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Andrew Pedroza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dias v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11138
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Dias
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Molyneux v. Commission of Social Security
as 1:2024cv11052
Plaintiff:
Felicia Molyneux
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
