District of Massachusetts Social Security Cases
Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 991
Duffy v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv12342
Plaintiff:
John Duffy
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Altman v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30177
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Derrick Altman
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gonzalez v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv12243
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
SolMaria Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Dejong v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv40163
Plaintiff:
Tanya Dejong
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Ramos v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv40161
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Jose Enrigue Ramos
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Roberson v. Hernandez
as 3:2018cv30151
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Kyle Roberson
Defendant:
Eric Hernandez
Cause Of Action: Securities Fraud
Ortega v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30147
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Luz J. Ortega
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis v Berryhill
as 4:2018cv40146
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
David Davis
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vasquez v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv40132
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Menorca A. Vasquez
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
A.F. v. Social Security Office
as 4:2018cv40130
Defendant:
Social Security Office
Plaintiff:
A.F.
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
