Massachusetts Social Security Cases
Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,028
DeRosa v. Saul et al
as 1:2019cv11802
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Priscilla DeRosa
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Siewe v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11733
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Willy Siewe
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kilpatrick v. Saul et al
as 1:2019cv11657
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Laura Jean Kilpatrick
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Sawtelle v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11614
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Plaintiff:
Lisa Sawtelle
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Cano v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11563
Plaintiff:
Joseline A. Cano
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dicologero v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11550
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Dicologero
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Furey v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11514
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Dena Marie Furey
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Pelkey v. Saul et al
as 1:2019cv11479
Plaintiff:
Scott E Pelkey
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Varad v. Saul et al
as 1:2019cv11480
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Varad
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Perez v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11444
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Israel Perez
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
