Massachusetts Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,087
McKeage v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv11683
Plaintiff:
Lorraine McKeage
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prescott v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv40104
Plaintiff:
Jamie Prescott
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woolley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv30103
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Mason Woolley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grant v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv11396
Plaintiff:
Jessica Grant
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv40085
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hough v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv40082
Plaintiff:
Shawn Andrew Hough
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bayas v. Saul
as 1:2021cv11086
Plaintiff:
James Bayas
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Saul
as 4:2021cv11052
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
missioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mahoney v. Kijakazi et al
as 1:2021cv10992
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Mahoney
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Ellison v Saul
as 1:2021cv10898
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Ellison
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
