US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv13007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv13009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12991
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fortney v. Great Lakes Wine and Spirits
as 2:2024cv12985
Plaintiff:
Tara Fortney
Defendant:
Great Lakes Wine and Spirits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mukhamedina v. Marathon Petroleum Company, LP
as 4:2024cv12974
Defendant:
Marathon Petroleum Company, LP
Plaintiff:
Nurgul Mukhamedina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Oliver [E-filer] v. M.A.O. et al
as 2:2024cv12962
Defendant:
Stephanie Pyrros-Hensen, Elizabeth L. Gleicher, Ryan E. Christiansen and others
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Oliver [E-filer], M.A.O. and M.L.O.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pendygraft v. City of Durand et al
as 4:2024cv12965
Defendant:
Sarah Campbell, Nicole Noelle and City of Durand
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Pendygraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv12960
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
