US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 1,119
Miller #264790 v. Rath et al
as 1:2018cv01368
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso and Phil Rath
Plaintiff:
Barry B. Miller #264790
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera #201 800 803 v. Burda et al
as 1:2018cv01357
Plaintiff:
Ethen Manuel Rivera #201 800 803
Defendant:
Burda Law Offices PLC and Christi L. Burda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maggit #496871 v. Grand Rapids Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv01293
Defendant:
Grand Rapids Police Department, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Grand Rapids, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Maggit #496871
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #267009 v. Penman et al
as 1:2018cv01212
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009
Defendant:
Patricia Penman, Suzette Samuels, David Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Keene et al
as 1:2018cv01159
Defendant:
Tim Keene, Kevin Cook, Cass County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamburino #268269 v. Taylor et al
as 1:2018cv01100
Defendant:
Susan Melton, James Hughs, Ingham County Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic Tamburino #268269
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch #386312 v. Eagen et al
as 1:2018cv00956
Defendant:
Anthony King and Michael Eagen
Plaintiff:
Richard Lynch #386312
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #476889 v. Grimes et al
as 1:2018cv00938
Defendant:
Kimberly Richardson and Alex Grimes
Plaintiff:
Larry Devonte Harris #476889
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffit #271355 v. Fagerman et al
as 1:2018cv00916
Defendant:
Melissa Ransom and William M. Fagerman
Plaintiff:
Kelvin David Moffit #271355
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
White #177157 v. Govorchin et al
as 2:2018cv00138
Defendant:
Camille Sliger, Anthony Peter Govorchin and Michael C. Eagen
Plaintiff:
Charles Bruce White #177157
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
