Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,795
RSS Feed | View as table
Murphy v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv02957
Petitioner: Romel Murphy
Respondent: B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reynolds v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv02956
Petitioner: Terrell Reynolds
Respondent: B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hartwick v. Eischens et al
as 0:2024cv02877
Petitioner: William Burt Hartwick
Respondent: US Bureau of Prisons and B. Eischens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cocuzzi v. Reimann
as 0:2024cv02876
Petitioner: Michael Cocuzzi
Respondent: Shannon Reimann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamer v. Segal
as 0:2024cv02886
Petitioner: Rhonda A. Hamer
Respondent: Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrews v. Carlton
as 0:2024cv02799
Petitioner: Norris Deshon Andrews
Respondent: E.K. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrews v. Carlton
as 0:2024cv02797
Petitioner: Norris Deshon Andrews
Respondent: E.K. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McRaven v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv02722
Petitioner: Jeffrey Alan McRaven
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chocon-Gomez v. King We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv02737
Respondent: Mark King
Petitioner: Franklin Alizandro Chocon-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plascencia v. Segal
as 0:2024cv02702
Petitioner: Lisa A. Plascencia
Respondent: Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?