US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 3,760
Townsend v. Horne et al
as 4:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cameron Malik Townsend
Defendant:
L.T. Horne, Lee Prementer, Warden Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Sunflower County Sheriffs Department et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Crandall James
Defendant:
Sunflower County Sheriffs Department and Inverness Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Davis
as 1:2022cv00088
Petitioner:
Christopher Lee Thompson
Respondent:
Joshua Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. USA
as 1:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
Eiko T. Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Cain
as 4:2022cv00088
Petitioner:
Isiah Williams
Respondent:
Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend v. MDOC et al
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Cameron Malik Townsend
Defendant:
MDOC and Premier Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Huffman et al
as 4:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Rodney Johnson
Respondent:
Brand Huffman and Lynn Flinch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beck v. University of Mississippi Medical Center
as 4:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Marchello Beck
Defendant:
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. USA
as 4:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Hicks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Taylor v. Huffman
as 4:2022cv00078
Petitioner:
Kelvin Taylor
Respondent:
Brian Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
