US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 610
Evans v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Evans
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bennett
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. McDonald
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Ladner et al
as 1:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Denzel Milton Collins
Defendant:
Wade Ladner and Hancock County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Turner et al
as 1:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Travis Banks
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Jane Doe and Other Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchins v. O'Cain et al
as 3:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Russell L. Hutchins
Defendant:
Donald O'Cain, Penny Schuler and Fred Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Defendant:
Unknown Ellis, Unknown Williams, Frank Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Kroger et al
as 3:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Darrell Carter
Defendant:
Kroger and Hinds County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Little et al
as 3:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Burgess
Defendant:
O. Little , R. Abangan , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ratliff v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
James Curtis Ratliff
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
