US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 610
Jordan et al v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Richard Jordan and Ricky Chase
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher , Earnest Lee , The Mississippi State Executioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Yazoo, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Kyron La-Trell Williams
Defendant:
City of Yazoo, Mississippi, Yazoo City Police Department, Andre Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Sim Wolfe
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Rick McCarty, Johnnie Denmark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savinell v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv00333
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Savinell
Defendant:
Hurbert Davis and Chelsea Seabrooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv00329
Plaintiff:
Andre Johnson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Little et al
as 3:2014cv00483
Plaintiff:
Courtney Orlandus Hunt
Defendant:
Unknown Little and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palode v. Pearl River County
as 1:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
Lucien Lee Palode
Defendant:
Pearl River County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumrall v. Corso et al
as 1:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Dashawn L. Sumrall
Defendant:
Frederick Corso, Joseph Tuten, Melvin Brisolara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkinson v. FBOP (Yazoo Medium)
as 3:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Lester Atkinson, Jr.
Defendant:
FBOP (Yazoo Medium)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Banks v. One or More Unknown Named U.S. Agents et al
as 3:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One or More Unknown Named U.S. Agents, United States Attorney, One Named AUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
