Mississippi Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 8,630
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Marcum v. Lewis
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Alex Marcum
Defendant:
Lincoln Steven Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garth v. City of Aberdeen, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Lady B. Garth
Defendant:
City of Aberdeen, Mississippi, Charles Scott, Monroe County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Pilot Company et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Pilot Company, Hinds County Sheriff Department, Adam L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitehead v. The Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Bobby Whitehead
Defendant:
The Mississippi Department of Public Safety, R. T. Vaughn and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. City of Gulfport, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jermille Demoun Johnson and Maggie Denise Jonhson
Defendant:
City of Gulfport, Mississippi, Manuel Santos, Unknown Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
