US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 473
NRRM, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2018cv01899
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
NRRM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
NRRM, LLC v. John Doe
as 4:2018cv01868
Defendant:
John Doe, dba automotiveguarantee.com and John Doe
Plaintiff:
NRRM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Global Merchandising Services, Ltd. v. Various John Does et al
as 4:2018cv01117
Defendant:
ABC Companies, Jane Does and Various John Does
Plaintiff:
Global Merchandising Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Regenerative Wellness Center, LLC v. Otey et al
as 4:2018cv01110
Defendant:
Rodney Jones, TJS Holdings LLC, John Fogarty and others
Plaintiff:
Regenerative Wellness Center LLC and Regenerative Wellness Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Interface Security Systems, L.L.C. v. Doe 1
as 4:2018cv00920
Plaintiff:
Interface Security Systems, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc. v. Various John Does et al
as 4:2018cv00660
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc.
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does and ABC Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Nutreance LLC et al v. Primark, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Nutreance LLC , Idingo, LLC and Koech Corp.
Defendant:
Primark, LLC, Admark, LLC, Wastena Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Metrogistics, LLC v Metro Logistics, LLC
as 4:2017cv02776
Plaintiff:
Metrogistics, LLC
Defendant:
Metro Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
CVIN LLC v. Clarity Telecom, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
CVIN LLC
Defendant:
Clarity Telecom, LLC and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
St. Louis University v. Rice et al
as 4:2017cv02397
Plaintiff:
St. Louis University
Defendant:
Michael Todd Rice and Mandy Rice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
