US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 1,311
Gustafson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00115
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Callie Rae Gustafson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tompkins v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00708
Plaintiff:
Steven Tompkins
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stevens v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00029
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Stevens
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Biegel v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sarah E Biegel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Baker v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jimmie G Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Painter v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00022
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Painter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Enke v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00444
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Vanessa B. Enke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Watkins v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00433
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nicole Watkins
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
O'Bright Jr. v.Saul
as 2:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Earnest F O'Bright, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hunter et al v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00405
Plaintiff:
Lynn E. Hunter
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.