US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 1,249
Rodgers v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv01727
Plaintiff:
Mirion K. Rodgers
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edwards v. Berryhill

as 2:2018cv00087
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Racheal M. Edwards
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Butler v. Berryhill

as 4:2018cv01551
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline L. Butler
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Murphy v. Berryhill

as 2:2018cv00082
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Tana L Murphy and Tana L. Murphy
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Perkins v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00221
In Re:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Dana Lachelle Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Markley v. Berryhill

as 2:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Hope M Markley and Hope M. Markley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Turner v. Berryhill

as 1:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
billy joe turner
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woods v. Berryhill

as 4:2018cv01431
Plaintiff:
Vinetta Woods
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carroll v. Berryhill

as 1:2018cv00210
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
John Carroll
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tatro v. Berryhill

as 1:2018cv00204
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Terri L. Tatro
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.