US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Perkins-Bey v. Housing Authority of St. Louis County et al
as 4:2011cv00310
Plaintiff:
Alton M. Perkins-Bey
Defendant:
Housing Authority of St. Louis County and Susan Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Wal-Mart
as 4:2010cv01302
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Clark
Defendant:
Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Schnelting v. St. Clair R-XIII School District
as 4:2010cv01240
Plaintiff:
Daniel Schnelting
Defendant:
St. Clair R-XIII School District
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Daughtery v. The Heights et al
as 4:2010cv00942
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Daughtery
Defendant:
The Heights, Cassie Dauer, Mary Siler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lewis et al v. Whole Foods Market
as 4:2010cv00854
Plaintiff:
Diane M. Lewis and Allen R. Berry
Defendant:
Whole Foods Market
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
v. Housing et al
as 4:2009cv01735
Defendant:
Franklin County Housing, Edward Hillhouse, Ann G.L. Schroeder and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Beckman
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
White et al v. Draper
as 4:2009cv01005
Plaintiff:
LeRotha J. White and Carlos W. White
Defendant:
Carlyle Investments and Doug Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Naugles et al v. Puro
as 4:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Naugles and Fay Harris-Naugles
Defendant:
Edward A. Puro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. Union Housing Associates Limited Partnership et al
as 4:2008cv01577
Plaintiff:
Diane L Coleman
Defendant:
Union Housing Associates Limited Partnership and Dominium Management Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valliant v. Caruthersville Housing Authority et al
as 1:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
Evonne Valliant
Defendant:
Caruthersville Housing Authority and Elizabeth Hightower
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
